So here we are. One more week. Seven more merciful days until we can put this freakshow election behind us. With conflicting polls and the FBI leaking like a $20 yacht in a hurricane, the only sure bet at this point is that there will be a library’s worth of books written on how in the hell Donald Trump managed to almost (knocking on everything wooden in sight) become president.
I’m a political junkie, but his race has just about done it for me. Every day I see a headline that makes me furrow my brow and shake my head. I wouldn’t ever fall for the clickbait if it weren’t for the need to stay informed and literate in political discussions at work.
Ever since CNN poured $50 million into political coverage a year ago, facts and rationale have taken a back seat to ratings and drama. But it goes beyond “reality news” stations like CNN and Fox. Just the other day The Hill ran a headline that said “Ex-FBI official calls the Clintons a crime family.” I mean good God, The Hill is supposed to be a sane policy rag and even they have succumbed to reporting comments that shouldn’t be repeated outside of the parlor.
When people say that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have run the nastiest election in modern memory, they’re wrong. Donald Trump has run the nastiest election in history.
Trump normalized “loser” as a political adjective. Trump made it so that we’re no longer shocked by headlines that say “A 5th accuser comes forward.” Trump created a toxic environment where in the land of the free he calls for his opponent to be jailed and openly uses the word “criminal” to describe her. Remember, this is a contest where the loser goes back to their house, not to the gallows.
Here we are, America, and a week before the election and you have liberals wearing shirts that say “Nasty Woman” and conservatives changing their Twitter handles to “Deplorable Dan.” The thing is, I think Clinton is right that a good handful of Trump supporters are deplorable people, but the fact that it is a phrase used by a candidate for president about another candidate’s supporters demonstrates what a sad state of affairs this is.
We are all flying the same flag, right?
Remember when everyone freaked out in 2012 because Romney called half of Obama supporters poor? Is it wrong that I yearn for a time when closed door, off-the-cuff comments about voting patterns based on economic status was the worst gaffe a politician could make?
Trump created this new environment. Opinions used to have to be vetted before they made it to a national audience. Uncouth comments used to get a candidate banished. Now they’re paraded across the screen in promos for The Situation Room.
No matter how many fact-checking chryons CNN employs while they air Trump’s comments, the damage is done just by sharing them. People see “Clinton is a criminal” in quotes next to a CNN logo and boom, now they’re telling their neighbors that Clinton should be in jail. Sounds too simple? Talk to some of the people in Kansas, Florida, and New York that I have over the past year.
Yes, the media has an obligation to report the day’s events, so of course there is the argument that even if Trump says something crazy, they need to air it. That is wrong.
If Trump says “my opponent is a criminal who should be jailed” then airing that quote is making that sound like it could be true. A recent poll showed that 40% of Georgia Republicans think Hillary and Bill were legitimately involved in murders to hide criminal activity. Trust me, Washington is way more VEEP than House of Cards.
But alas, I digress. After the dust settles on this mess we can discuss the media’s culpability in this disaster until pigs fly. We probably won’t even be done by then.
What I really want to understand here, is were these nationalist feelings and hate always present in America and we just never knew it? How can a process usually dominated by lifelong public servants debating issues devolve into a grade school food fight with one candidate shouting “no you’re the puppet!” over the other during a debate in front of 70 million people. If I did that in front of 10 people I’d be mortified, much less 20% of the entire country.
How can 40% of my fellow Americans be duped–willingly or blindly–into supporting the single worst candidate for president, ever.
Never have so many conservative papers endorsed a Democrat. Never have so many papers made their first ever endorsement. And never have so many papers dis-endorsed a candidate before. This isn’t because Hillary is the Messiah, but because Trump is a fear mongering moron with no respect for anything but himself.
This election and its tired coverage has reduced our nation to two even more divided camps than we were before. But, it’s no longer about Democrat vs Republican but rather sane folk vs Trump supporters. How can someone vote for the sober, Mormon Romney and the war hero McCain and then suddenly side with Donald “grab ‘em by the pussy” Trump? Have our national morals been corrupted that badly?
Back in January before the Iowa caucuses I wrote in my original blog for this site that Trump was running a campaign of fear and had galvanized those who feared “the other.” I wrote how this was a powerful, terrifying message, but that in the long run, hope always dominated over fear and despair.
With 7 days remaining, and polls that require me to put new sheets on my bed each morning, I can only pray that I’m right.
Follow on Twitter @EighteenthandU